BitConnect class action straddles dangerous precedent

The collapse of BitConnect's Ponzi scheme has highlighted the perils of crytocurrency’s anti-regulation ideals which last week led to a class action lawsuit filed against BitConnect promoters.

The class action brings into question how an unregulated space like cryptocurrency can interact with such a regulated space like the legal system.

Although the class action is unlikely to go to trial against all named defendants, it would raise various human rights issues if it does.

Listed defendants in the class action include content creators Trevon James, Craig Grant, Ryan Hildreth as well as popular YouTuber, CryptoNick.

Whilst all four have been unrelentingly ridiculed for their roles in promoting BitConnect’s fraudulent scheme, of which they profited when investors used their referral links, all are still able to operate within the unregulated crypto space albeit with little credibility to their names.

When settling any matter through judiciary means, the concept of “intent” is fundamental to any judgement.

Although the aforementioned promoters played a significant role in thousands of investors losing their investments through the BitConnect scheme, none actually worked for BitConnect or hold any directorial responsibilities. For this reason, thier intent to defraud investors would be impossible to prove.

Their shameless promoting of the service was purely to grow their audience whilst making financial gains through BitConnect’s affiliate program hence it cannot be proved that any name defendants knew they were promoting a Ponzi scheme.

Over the past century, professional marketers have played enormous roles in financial and personal loss but never have they explicitly been responsible when the product or service they are marketing collapses.

For example, advertising companies which market cigarettes are not responsible for the cancer caused to smokers. But who is – the cigarette company or the smoker?

Quite frankly, it’s the smoker.

Unfortunately for those investors who blindly brought into BitConnect, the same concept applies here which is why it is unlikely those name defendants will have any legal repercussion from the class action.

Shilling of individual cryptocurrencies is rife across all social media platforms, of which promoters are grossly underqualified to give any sort of financial securities advice.

But with the prevalence of shilling across platforms predominantly used by younger and less-informed audiences, thousands - if not millions - of people will fall victim to poor advice unless they get extremely lucky.

Ultimately, the BitConnect saga has just identified the pitfalls of ignorance within social media.