You are contradicting yourself. You are saying you are not promoting anyone and including a name of a guy who just has 580 followers. If he is really good TA then good for you don’t rub your opinions on others. And don’t try to talk shit about @haejin when you have not even been in Steemit community for a month. People who are following @haejin have been doing that since more then a few months. If you would just follow his posts and read them carefully you would know what he is talking about.
So what's wrong with this? Besides being sloppy and ridiculous, it disobeys the fundamental rule of Elliott Waves that states wave 4 can't encroach on the territory of wave 1.
That is EW 101.
It's the first and only chart of his I need to look at.
Have you ever read any book related to Elliott waves ? I highly doubt it. You'd better learn a bit more, that would increase your insights. You'd have known that a wave 4 can go below the top of wave 1 without breaking the rules : and that is called a diagonal, which can be leading, ending, contracting, expanding. That is also EW 101 as you say. If you don't wanna listen to this comment, at least you could check by yourself what my teacher wrote (Prechter) in the recommended book, if that's not too much work. Once that done, check the weekly chart of BTCUSD and come back with more objectivity.
You have no idea who I am or what I know, but that is besides the point. You can't have wave 4 going below the top of wave one on impulses...only corrective waves.
If that's the case (Haejin style), then your friend's analysis implies that the entire history of POWR is a corrective diagonal.
Since you're lazy, here's a bit of tasty stuff that comes right from its source.
"Rules:
Diagonals are always 5 wave structures.
Structure = 3-3-3-3-3 or 5-3-3-3-3
Leading Diagonals happen in Wave 1 of an Impulse or Wave A of a ZigZag.
Wave 2 & 4 always subdivide in ZigZag corrections.
Wave 2 Never moves beyond origin of Wave 1.
Wave 3 must go beyond Wave 1. Wave 4 must move into wave 1 range but not beyond Wave 2.
Wave 5 must go beyond Wave 3, there should be no "Truncation".
In Contracting Diagonals, Wave 3 is always shorter than Wave 1, Wave 4 Shorter than Wave 2, and Wave 5 shorter than Wave 3.
In Expanding Diagonals, Wave 3 is always longer than Wave 1, Wave 4 longer than Wave 2, and Wave 5 longer than Wave 3.
"
I don't know who you are and what you know, but I know who you are not and what you don't know. Simple as that.
I wish you MASSIVE profits!
Guys open your eyes. I am not promoting anyone. But @salahuddin2004 deserve respect for his TA. Look at haejin new drama
You should not lie on a blockchain... "Guys open your eyes. I am not promoting anyone."
You are openly promoting nothing but one account, resteeming and yelling everywhere else.
I don't see that saladdin of yours have ANYTHING to teach anyone. He just show off his ta and some claims, just like I do myself..
Haejin is a great teacher, show me a better teacher of TA please?
Fact: NOT ANYONE can teach how YOU find this bullish calls.
Guys open your eyes. I am not promoting anyone. But @salahuddin2004 deserve respect for his TA. Look at haejin new drama
Guys open your eyes. I am not promoting anyone. But @salahuddin2004 deserve respect for his TA. Look at haejin new drama
You are contradicting yourself. You are saying you are not promoting anyone and including a name of a guy who just has 580 followers. If he is really good TA then good for you don’t rub your opinions on others. And don’t try to talk shit about @haejin when you have not even been in Steemit community for a month. People who are following @haejin have been doing that since more then a few months. If you would just follow his posts and read them carefully you would know what he is talking about.
Not only are you a troll, but you could do better than promote a guy who can't follow the rules of EW properly.
No one here gives a shit what you think. We come here freely and upvote freely because we appreciate and value what Haejin does.
Your campaign is worthless
Here is an attempt at EW analysis by your @salahuddin2004 for POWR.
https://steemit.com/powr/@salahuddin2004/powerledger-will-power-to-usd-3-30-prediction-25
So what's wrong with this? Besides being sloppy and ridiculous, it disobeys the fundamental rule of Elliott Waves that states wave 4 can't encroach on the territory of wave 1.
That is EW 101.
It's the first and only chart of his I need to look at.
Do you even know what you are talking about?
Have you ever read any book related to Elliott waves ? I highly doubt it. You'd better learn a bit more, that would increase your insights. You'd have known that a wave 4 can go below the top of wave 1 without breaking the rules : and that is called a diagonal, which can be leading, ending, contracting, expanding. That is also EW 101 as you say. If you don't wanna listen to this comment, at least you could check by yourself what my teacher wrote (Prechter) in the recommended book, if that's not too much work. Once that done, check the weekly chart of BTCUSD and come back with more objectivity.
You have no idea who I am or what I know, but that is besides the point. You can't have wave 4 going below the top of wave one on impulses...only corrective waves.
If that's the case (Haejin style), then your friend's analysis implies that the entire history of POWR is a corrective diagonal.
Congratulations
Since you're lazy, here's a bit of tasty stuff that comes right from its source.
I don't know who you are and what you know, but I know who you are not and what you don't know. Simple as that.
Have to ignore you ... sorry ...
You need to get your shit right.
Umer you are right about this slut haejin