Peter Schiff vs. Bitcoin: Why the Economist Calls BTC a ‘Memecoin’ (And Why It Matters)

Imagine if someone called Taylor Swift a “karaoke singer” or claimed pineapple belongs on pizza. That’s the energy Peter Schiff brings to the Bitcoin debate. As Bitcoin flirts with $100k, the gold-obsessed economist just declared it a “Memecoin” – a label usually reserved for joke tokens like Dogecoin. Is this a valid critique or sour grapes? Let’s dive into the clash between crypto’s rebel and gold’s old guard.

Who Is Peter Schiff? The Gold Standard’s Loudest Cheerleader

Peter Schiff isn’t your average suit-and-tie economist. He’s the CEO of Euro Pacific Capital, a vocal gold bug, and the guy who’s been shouting “Bitcoin is a bubble!” since it cost less than a Netflix subscription.

From Tulips to Trump Coins: A History of Skepticism

In 2013, Schiff compared Bitcoin to the 17th-century Tulip Mania. Back then, BTC was $355. Fast-forward to 2025, and he’s upgraded his insult to “Memecoin” – lumping Bitcoin with tokens like Trump Coin ($TRUMP). His logic? Both rely on “hype over substance.”

Key Takeaway: Schiff’s consistency is admirable… or stubborn. As Bitcoiners moonwalk to new highs, he’s still playing the same gold-recorded album.

“Bitcoin Is a Memecoin” – Breaking Down Schiff’s Bombshell

Schiff’s latest rant started on X (formerly Twitter), where he dropped this gem: “There’s no difference between $TRUMP and Bitcoin. Explaining a Memecoin without exposing Bitcoin’s fraud is impossible.”

Why the Memecoin Label Stings

Memecoins thrive on viral trends, not tech. Dogecoin began as a Shiba Inu joke. Trump Coin rides political hype. By calling Bitcoin a Memecoin, Schiff argues:

• No intrinsic value: Unlike gold (used in tech/jewelry), BTC’s worth hinges on collective belief.
• Volatility = Speculation: BTC’s 10% daily swings attract gamblers, not investors.

Counterpoint: Bitcoin’s blockchain secures $1T+ in value. Memecoins? Not so much.

Gold vs. Bitcoin: The Never-Ending Financial Feud

Schiff’s mantra: “Gold is real money. The Constitution says so.” Let’s unpack this:

Tangible vs. Digital: A Clash of Eras

• Gold’s Resume: Conducts electricity, doesn’t corrode, looks pretty on necks.
• Bitcoin’s Resume: Decentralized, limited supply, cross-border payments in minutes.

Price Tag Throwdown

In 2017, 1 Bitcoin = 1 gold ounce. Today? 1 BTC = 38 ounces. Ouch. Schiff claims gold will hit $20k/ounce, but even that would barely close the gap.

Schiff’s Blind Spot: Millennials prefer apps over vaults. Gold can’t be sent via text.

Bitcoiners Strike Back: Counterarguments to Schiff’s Claims

Bitcoin’s fanbase isn’t shy. Here’s their rebuttal:

1. “Gold’s Supply Isn’t So Limited”

• Asteroid mining could flood the market (hello, trillionaires!).
• Bitcoin’s 21M cap is code-enforced – no cosmic loopholes.

2. “Try Sending Gold to Zimbabwe in 10 Minutes”

Bitcoin’s utility shines in hyperinflation zones. Ask Argentinians or Nigerians.

3. “Schiff’s Stuck in 1983”

As Anthony Pompliano noted, “Peter thinks ‘blockchain’ is a new type of bike lock.”

Memecoins, Bitcoin, and You: 3 Lessons for Savvy Investors

1. DYOR (Don’t YOLO On Rumors)

Memecoins = lottery tickets. Bitcoin = a (risky) tech bet. Know the difference.

2. Diversify Like You’re Betting on Both Red and Black

Hedge with gold and crypto. Traditional markets too.

3. Ignore Absolutists

Schiff says “Bitcoin to zero.” Maximalists say “Gold is boomer bait.” Truth? Both have points.

---

Final Thoughts
Peter Schiff’s “Memecoin” jab is clickbait gold, but it sparks a crucial debate: What gives money value? Consensus or concrete use? Whether you side with gold’s glitter or Bitcoin’s bytes, stay curious – and diversified.

Disclaimer: This article is entertainment, not financial advice. Consult a pro before trading your gold bars for JPEGs.