You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bitcoin Cash gets DarkMarket and LULz from Torrent Site!
Core has answered with a solution! Is it enough idk:) https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@sames/bitcoin-newest-scaling-method-adding-bech32-plus-others
It's not. While it might help to bring down the fees and be easier to adopt than segwit, it will not undo the current technical issues brought on by mismanagement of the blocksize. It will also not undo segwit or any of the other changes made.
Its good alternatives and can improve technical difficulties, and yes i do believe in a small block increase but not bch thinking that big block solve all.
I suggest you read my post
Sure. I'll have a look at it later. My opinion is not that big blocks solve everything either. As a matter of fact I've yet to come across a Bitcoin Cash user who thinks that's all there is too it.
Really? All the bcash supporters i find all say big block are the only solution.
They solve a lot, that's for sure. They solve the immediate issue with fees as well as the clogging of the main chain, which in a sense can be seen as analogous to "censorship" or "monopolization" of the network. But they don't safeguard against future social issues amongst developers, nor does it go far enough alone in restoring the features found in the original Bitcoin.
So even if Legacy found a way to implement Lightning in a manner that most Cash users would agree with, it still wouldn't make Bitcoin Cash as such a redundant implementation.
Unless they can find an alternative for segwit that fixes malbilty issue the lightning network can't be used or they add segwit then that another story....
Yeah, that's what I'm getting at.
Bitcoin cash won't add segwit. But if they can find an alternative to segwit that fixes malbity issues they can't add lightning network. And at the current rate most of the bitcoin cash developers are looking for finding even bigger blocks. https://news.bitcoin.com/7-million-transactions-a-second-research-paper-declares-1tb-blocks-feasible/