RE: What is Bitcoin? - When Money becomes a content type!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What is Bitcoin? - When Money becomes a content type!

View the full context

mathowl (64)in #bitcoin • 7 years ago (edited)

Content type: long, expert/technical
Awarded 4 out of 6 owls:

Good job!

Details: The citation and sources owl was not awarded since the pictures require sources. In addition in text citations are absent. The originality owl was not awarded since it requires that the content is explained in a creative/novel way.

Note: This post was not upvoted since it was past its payout date. Instead this post was upvoted

7 years ago in #bitcoin by mathowl (64)

Sort:

sblue (52) 7 years ago

Hey @mathowl!

Thanks for stopping by and owl-curating one of my posts! I feel honoured, and I'm grateful. I'm happy to see that the posts met the standards of 4 owls! :)

Since there seem to be some shortcoming in the citation and sources department, please allow me to do the citation and sources owl some justice.

I always try to include all necessary sources but thought that a fully blown APA standard might be an overkill. Maybe I'll get there since I feel like transparency is crucial. Also, I think every source deserves the credit.

So... why didn't I include the sources?

Images: The two images used in this article are from Pixabay. They are free for commercial use and don't require attribution. Which is why I left the source out. In hindsight, I should've listed Pixabay under Sources and Additional Information. Just for the sake of transparency and gratitude for providing free pictures. If you check out my latest post, you'll find out, that I improved that. All images now have a short caption and link to the source. Furthermore, Pixabay and/or Pexels is listed under Sources and Additional Information.
Illustrations: The illustrations are created by myself, which makes it tricky to list a source 😅. The illustrations are a simplified version of the ones to be found in the Book "Mastering Bitcoin" from Andreas Antonopoulos. Although Andreas, as well as his books, are listed in the sources, I guess that I could've done better. This is also something I improved in my latest post. Feel free to check it out.

Thanks again for taking time to curate my post. I feel honoured and appreciate your feedback!
I'm hoping to see your owls again on another blog post of mine.
Keep up your excellent work and have a great day!
Cheers - @sblue