You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: When two fight over a blockchain.
You should stop calling it Big China Coin. It immediately paints your bias. It becomes clear you don't understand Bitcoin at all.
BCC is the original, real Bitcoin as per the white paper. The Seg-Wit Bitcoin is the fork attack, although it may be what the market prefers, since the market is, as usual, technically ignorant.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lexiconical/seg-wit-is-a-trojan-horse-bitcoin-scaling-debate-explained
It's all right there - SegWit is the literal destruction of the bitcoin whitepaper.
PS - Do you mean Bitcoin Unchained, stan's bitcoin "fork"?
It is okay that it gets clear what my choice is in this situation.
Thank you for sharing your take on this. The only thing I can reply with, as you are apparantly in a position to state that I have no knowledge about Bitcoin, is that you better have your private keys under your own control.
And as for Bitcoin United, it is the brilliant idea of Stan Larimer to be over and done with this, once and for all.
Because no matter what you think you know, fact is that Bitcoin can be subject to blockchain split attacks. Apparantly we agree on that there is a split attack either way. So... Who's next to split attack?
That is why my bet is not on the fighting two POW mining energy wasters, but on the third that will take it all: Bitcoin United, BCU.
(Technicly seen it is not a fork by the way.)