You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Globalist Plan To Blame Bitcoin For Biblical Level Collapse In 2018
Did you just upbraid me for not responding to your comment within the comment itself? Here's a couple things:
You don't understand debt and it's role in the economy. Not even a little bit. "Omg it's a large number!" What exactly do you think you're measuring? What is its causal mechanistic relation to the economy at large?
"Fiat cryptocurrency" What does this even mean? Why would it be necessary when the government already totally controls the US dollar?
Conspiracy theorizing about a government that leaks like a sieve and is barely functional at the strategic and tactical levels.
In conclusion, you are stupid and everybody who upvoted you is even stupider.
Respectfully u don’t seem to understand debt and money printing. Let me guess liberal arts degree ? 🐑
Wrong. My turn to guess: college dropout who hasn't taken anything past microecon and thinks they know anything at all because they watched some YouTube videos from Misses or Bastiat?
Smart move not wasting ur money or going into debt for a worthless degree. U must not be a total moron! But Dude where did u learn about finance and economic issues?
Graduate school.
Haha I misread ur response. I thought u said u were a college drop out and that’s why I gave u credit. So u are just a sheep who doesn’t have real Biz experience just a graduate degree and a lot of debt! No wonder your pretending debt is ok. Clearly your up to ur ass in loans. Enjoy being a 🐑 buddy. I don’t care about graduate school
I made a million by the time I was 30. Keep up being a sheep
Boy, you just don't know how the world works, do you. Grad students (most of them) get PAID. Either as TAs or RAs.
No you didn't.
I disagree with ya on everything but upvoted outta respect 👍
kermitbear sounds like a butthurt bitch that is mad about not getting into cryptocurrencies so long ago when he first heard Jeff recommend it.
Who is "Jeff"?
Shut the hell up, @kermodebear
Triggered?
Really? We are even stupider? So, besides not making any good point or counter-argument, you berate other steemians who upvoted this post because you disagree with the OP.
Do you realize where you are at, what type of platform you are posting on?
Arguments get counterarguments. Nonsense econojargon babble gets ridicule. Jesus, you guys are fuckin snowflakes.
I'm still waiting for any valid point you have.
No, you aren't.
Of course I am. You seem to be very opinionated, and resort to name-calling, rather than any type of discussion. Disagreeing with the OP, or other's commenting is fine, but your tact is very lacking. BTW, #snowflake is the most overused term of the year. Maybe @kermodebear just needs to permanently hibernate.
You flagged a comment that points out three obvious problems with OP's formulation. To stage a counterargument being that requires that OP had stated a coherent argument in the first place. How do you argue against a graph of some number going up that is not connected argumentatively to anything? How do you argue against wild evidence-free conspiracy speculation that the government is going to bring into existence a "fiat cryptocurrency", a pointless contradiction in terms? At some point OP is just babbling and you gotta stop rewarding the delusion.
"three obvious problems"
I'm not really a fan of DV, but you really didn't point out shit.
"You don't understand debt and it's role in the economy. Not even a little bit. "Omg it's a large number!" What exactly do you think you're measuring? What is its causal mechanistic relation to the economy at large?"
This is laughable. These are generic questions. Answering them explains very little and answering them in the context of your comment doesn't even make a point.
"Fiat cryptocurrency" What does this even mean? Why would it be necessary when the government already totally controls the US dollar?"
Sound like a state backed crypto.
"Conspiracy theorizing about a government that leaks like a sieve and is barely functional at the strategic and tactical levels."
It sounds to me like he is theorizing about a group of people who control governments and make them purposefully bloated and "barely functional at the strategic and tactical levels.", but whatever. I'm not going to comment on this personally, but reading comprehension helps.
again, I don't really like DV, but it's completely obvious that your sentiments toward any issues related to the OP are just as wrong.
It's obvious that you aren't really willing to engage intellectually on this at all.