Doesn't a 'fork' of Bitcoin imply that whichever of the forked blockchains is truly 'Bitcoin' is debatable?

At first I was brainwashed by the /r/Bitcoin subreddit into thinking that Bitcoin, Segwit and LN are the way.

After doing research and learning of the censorship (and its intent) I am convinced that BCH represents the true intent of Bitcoin.

One criticism of those like Roger Ver is that he calls BCH the real Bitcoin - I don't think he is wrong. And who is to say he is?

The community should decide. A fork means that two cryptos emerged from one. Who is any one person to say that one is truly Bitcoin vs. the other?

Bitcoin Cash can be used peer-to-peer, with low fees and leveraging zero-conf. Bitcoin cannot - anyone who has worked in or knows the retail industry must understand that Bitcoin as is is not usable in that environment because of its high fees, slowness and replace by fee functionality.

I may get flagged or attract shills but I do not care. Someone needs to spread the truth around what's going on with the flagship cryptocurrency.