I'm not sure. Andreas says it so it has to be true, right? 😛

I like that talk, if you're interested. He analogs Bitcoin and Ethereum to a shark and a lion, each king's of their respective domain, no "better" or worse in general.

And one thing he mentions (if I recall correctly) is that a tradeoff to Ethereum being designed as it is is that it won't be as secure.

I think it's always like a range of likelihood, right? Like we don't know absolutely 100% that Bitcoin is secure. We just know it hasn't been broken yet, and it approaches 100% the longer it goes. So it could be like it's just harder to put confidence in the idea that Ethereum is secure... so if it's like 99.99% vs 99.31%, the 99.99% seems substantially better and where the money should go, even if the other one is most likely not critically flawed.