BCH follows the white paper. BTC does not follow the white paper. Reading the white paper over and over should give you a true sense of what Satoshi would call Bitcoin. This is about what follows the instructions and road map. You can't change the engineering plan of a Lamborghini to look like a Beetle and still call it a Lamborghini. BCH stayed true to the white paper. BTC added segwit which was an unwise thing to do if you know anything about mining and programming. BTC became a coin with signatures off chain and took off the personal signatures of the people sending a transaction. This simple change in programming undermined the whole purpose of digital signatures that made Bitcoin unique. BTC is not unique anymore.

If the Bitcoin white paper says bitcoin is DEFINED as "digital signatures on chain" and segwit takes digital signatures off chain, can BTC still honestly call itself Bitcoin? BCH is the only Bitcoin of the white paper.

If you know the difference, Resteem this to share the awareness. Resteeming is free, and it's the easiest way to help a minnow especially if you are a minnow. Our voting power may be low, but our Resteeming power is high