TOP 200 effective Steemit curators who are actively support newcomers (with reputation below 55) for the 2017.09.22

boddhisattva (79)in #bisteemit • 7 years ago

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

image source

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will talk about those curators, who are actively support newcomers. All of us know that it's not easy to become visible while you are a minnow even if you have a good content. Therefore, I believe that curators who actively support newcomers deserve a separate consideration and respect.

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published their posts for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

5739 authors with reputation below 55 published their posts during this day. And it's a 83% of all authors.

18686 accounts participated in curating the content of authors with reputation below 55. It's a 56% of all curators.

164720 votes were made for the content of authors with reputation below 55 during this day. It's a 50% of all votes.

9440,96 SBD - is the total author rewards the content of authors with reputation below 55 for this day. It's a 32% of all rewards.

TOP-200 effective curators for September 22, 2017

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@minnowbooster	257	206	2	910,94	9,65	32,7
2	@curie	120	118	4	1424,53	15,09	29,29
3	@good-karma	863	702	0	234,89	2,49	28,73
4	@hendrikdegrote	119	117	4	807,4	8,55	16,46
5	@pharesim	386	374	0	111,96	1,19	7,3
6	@randowhale	132	87	2	136,67	1,45	2,07
7	@surpassinggoogle	54	48	9	244,1	2,59	2,04
8	@randowhalebonus	287	165	3	57,65	0,61	1,66
9	@joele	423	273	2	32,04	0,34	1,52
10	@minnowsupport	364	329	1	25,56	0,27	1,47
11	@randowhale1	91	71	3	109,62	1,16	1,36
12	@bitcoiner	799	668	1	9,75	0,1	1,13
13	@booster	59	49	3	124,07	1,31	1,06
14	@esteemapp	850	687	1	8,5	0,09	1,02
15	@tumutanzi	35	33	10	160,62	1,7	0,92
16	@promoted	79	65	12	80,47	0,85	0,91
17	@anwenbaumeister	119	117	4	42,83	0,45	0,87
18	@hr1	52	35	20	140,68	1,49	0,86
19	@randowhale0	67	49	3	84,78	0,9	0,72
20	@bellyrub	56	45	3	91,84	0,97	0,72
21	@wackou	52	52	5	60,73	0,64	0,55
22	@cervantes	34	34	16	69,11	0,73	0,41
23	@sanghkaang	22	21	100	95,22	1,01	0,35
24	@htliao	26	24	6	72,14	0,76	0,3
25	@d-pend	209	204	1	8,06	0,09	0,29
26	@blocktrades	4	4	29	399,56	4,23	0,28
27	@kushed	117	115	1	13,09	0,14	0,26
28	@timsaid	44	44	4	31,52	0,33	0,24
29	@lastminuteman	359	325	0	3,69	0,04	0,21
30	@donkeypong	20	20	9	58,89	0,62	0,21
31	@planter	25	25	29	45,67	0,48	0,2
32	@twinner	71	62	5	17,79	0,19	0,19
33	@midnas-howler	38	38	12	26,88	0,28	0,18
34	@levycore	47	45	10	21,78	0,23	0,17
35	@ausbitbank	21	17	8	54,24	0,57	0,16
36	@aiqabrago	27	27	21	28,19	0,3	0,13
37	@xeldal	34	30	3	22,82	0,24	0,12
38	@drotto	350	300	1	2,11	0,02	0,11
39	@pgarcgo	32	32	16	19,38	0,21	0,11
40	@heiditravels	32	32	16	20,39	0,22	0,11
41	@analisa	20	20	9	32,99	0,35	0,11
42	@officialfuzzy	9	9	42	64,01	0,68	0,1
43	@gargon	32	32	16	18,08	0,19	0,1
44	@broncnutz	24	24	26	23,49	0,25	0,1
45	@aomura	57	48	98	11,54	0,12	0,1
46	@kommienezuspadt	9	9	72	61,74	0,65	0,1
47	@minnowhelper	33	22	11	19,98	0,21	0,08
48	@cheftony	199	175	1	2,49	0,03	0,08
49	@buildawhale	37	27	11	17,82	0,19	0,08
50	@kevinwong	23	23	8	20,73	0,22	0,08
51	@randowhaletrail	287	165	2	2,76	0,03	0,08
52	@enki	39	38	6	10,49	0,11	0,07
53	@vortac	7	7	76	58,37	0,62	0,07
54	@boomerang	27	22	13	17,11	0,18	0,07
55	@nanzo-scoop	15	10	23	42,79	0,45	0,07
56	@cheerup	53	51	3	6,89	0,07	0,06
57	@team	39	39	10	8,56	0,09	0,06
58	@shaka	7	6	90	60,08	0,64	0,06
59	@jackkang	9	9	50	35,88	0,38	0,06
60	@tincho	32	32	8	9,3	0,1	0,05
61	@anu	40	39	9	7	0,07	0,05
62	@khoa	24	16	15	17,62	0,19	0,05
63	@abigail-dantes	19	16	29	18,25	0,19	0,05
64	@acidyo	5	5	15	42,7	0,45	0,04
65	@puncakbukit	178	140	11	1,56	0,02	0,04
66	@completelyanon	74	73	7	3,37	0,04	0,04
67	@adsactly	5	5	46	48,05	0,51	0,04
68	@msp-creativebot	33	21	8	11,71	0,12	0,04
69	@raybrockman	24	18	24	11,35	0,12	0,04
70	@dyuryul	9	9	51	22,35	0,24	0,04
71	@japanfund	11	8	69	21,87	0,23	0,03
72	@bottymcbotface	111	110	4	1,41	0,01	0,03
73	@dse	10	10	48	15,92	0,17	0,03
74	@abit	4	4	10	47,95	0,51	0,03
75	@mdquixil	38	35	100	5,36	0,06	0,03
76	@glitterfart	2	2	100	79,67	0,84	0,03
77	@gigafart	14	5	40	35,55	0,38	0,03
78	@trafalgar	5	5	10	28,74	0,3	0,03
79	@teamsteem	6	6	11	28,72	0,3	0,03
80	@wbulot	49	45	100	3,44	0,04	0,03
81	@sweetsssj	4	4	15	48,22	0,51	0,03
82	@whalereward	10	10	28	17,43	0,18	0,03
83	@simonjay	77	71	6	1,59	0,02	0,02
84	@misterakpan	301	295	3	0,32	0	0,02
85	@velourex	54	54	7	1,77	0,02	0,02
86	@trogdor	11	6	100	22,65	0,24	0,02
87	@fabio	14	14	16	7,47	0,08	0,02
88	@zahnspange	13	13	10	8,06	0,09	0,02
89	@steem-id	13	13	35	9,49	0,1	0,02
90	@wartrapa	32	32	16	2,84	0,03	0,02
91	@gbonikz	153	141	100	0,62	0,01	0,02
92	@steemed-proxy	2	2	40	43,82	0,46	0,02
93	@stevescoins	20	20	14	4,98	0,05	0,02
94	@lichtblick	23	20	10	5,8	0,06	0,02
95	@tabea	119	117	4	0,86	0,01	0,02
96	@titin	32	32	16	3,13	0,03	0,02
97	@busy.org	15	14	26	7,97	0,08	0,02
98	@knozaki2015	25	24	3	3,88	0,04	0,02
99	@oldstone	7	7	18	12,33	0,13	0,02
100	@betamusic	61	58	13	1,7	0,02	0,02
101	@linuslee0216	5	5	8	20,7	0,22	0,02
102	@jgcastrillo19	32	32	16	4,2	0,04	0,02
103	@dirkzett	10	8	100	11,74	0,12	0,02
104	@speda	45	17	25	7,39	0,08	0,02
105	@kusadasi	7	3	37	42,21	0,45	0,02
106	@michaeldavid	30	14	5	9,79	0,1	0,02
107	@edrivegom	399	365	1	0,33	0	0,02
108	@ripperone	9	9	9	10,49	0,11	0,02
109	@gbenga	12	11	55	9,37	0,1	0,02
110	@alexis555	9	9	8	12,23	0,13	0,02
111	@fuzzyvest	2	2	100	64,57	0,68	0,02
112	@hightouch	11	11	70	7,92	0,08	0,02
113	@eazyh	44	38	24	3,15	0,03	0,02
114	@warofcraft	30	30	20	4,71	0,05	0,02
115	@centerlink	32	25	11	4,99	0,05	0,02
116	@timcliff	10	9	45	10,84	0,11	0,02
117	@raymondspeaks	462	425	2	0,25	0	0,02
118	@wuhotan	113	113	12	1,25	0,01	0,02
119	@nelyp	32	32	16	1,14	0,01	0,01
120	@canadian-coconut	2	2	22	18,38	0,19	0,01
121	@greenjuice	17	16	15	3,36	0,04	0,01
122	@aniestudio	32	32	16	1,23	0,01	0,01
123	@mustard	6	5	28	12,13	0,13	0,01
124	@rynow	55	35	5	2,4	0,03	0,01
125	@s4s	2	2	56	18,26	0,19	0,01
126	@pal	32	32	0	0,96	0,01	0,01
127	@mangos	10	7	8	7,01	0,07	0,01
128	@cub1	26	26	20	2,5	0,03	0,01
129	@dresden	32	32	16	1,46	0,02	0,01
130	@creadordelfuturo	7	6	27	5,01	0,05	0,01
131	@gringalicious	5	5	51	9,64	0,1	0,01
132	@daveks	12	12	22	4,91	0,05	0,01
133	@chitty	7	5	89	11,85	0,13	0,01
134	@fabien	4	3	100	15,89	0,17	0,01
135	@originalworks	348	239	1	0,24	0	0,01
136	@awgbibb	24	15	10	5,44	0,06	0,01
137	@bigpanda	32	22	5	1,46	0,02	0,01
138	@discordia	18	16	16	3,97	0,04	0,01
139	@arcange	25	23	6	1,33	0,01	0,01
140	@ivan-perez-anies	32	32	16	1,57	0,02	0,01
141	@nextgen622	9	9	34	5,7	0,06	0,01
142	@firepower	41	40	1	1,23	0,01	0,01
143	@kumada90	13	12	37	3,05	0,03	0,01
144	@morning	5	5	57	10,86	0,12	0,01
145	@clayop	2	2	100	27,8	0,29	0,01
146	@fenghuang	2	2	100	24,23	0,26	0,01
147	@andalucia	13	5	87	12,52	0,13	0,01
148	@steemstem	11	11	23	6,38	0,07	0,01
149	@papa-pepper	9	9	40	5,19	0,05	0,01
150	@solar	130	128	1	0,66	0,01	0,01
151	@freiheit50	15	14	87	2,38	0,03	0,01
152	@steevc	20	19	15	2,65	0,03	0,01
153	@daio	51	50	49	0,61	0,01	0,01
154	@ben.zimmerman	119	117	2	0,33	0	0,01
155	@juliank	46	22	1	3,35	0,04	0,01
156	@b0y2k	13	13	10	3,65	0,04	0,01
157	@gamerveda	359	325	1	0,12	0	0,01
158	@someonewhoisme	3	3	100	18,05	0,19	0,01
159	@joseph	13	13	9	3,07	0,03	0,01
160	@svamiva	14	8	72	3,67	0,04	0,01
161	@albertvhons	44	34	23	0,87	0,01	0,01
162	@redes	9	9	8	7,98	0,08	0,01
163	@jaki01	6	6	23	8,08	0,09	0,01
164	@ch00fy	462	425	2	0,19	0	0,01
165	@bayanihan	11	11	19	2,86	0,03	0,01
166	@monomyth	16	16	49	2,35	0,02	0,01
167	@newhope	7	7	8	8,13	0,09	0,01
168	@msp-lovebot	30	15	20	3,34	0,04	0,01
169	@knircky	3	3	100	15,55	0,16	0,01
170	@querdenken	25	7	11	5,62	0,06	0,01
171	@skan	3	3	83	28,52	0,3	0,01
172	@johnsmith	4	4	100	14,51	0,15	0,01
173	@joanaltres	12	12	50	2,72	0,03	0,01
174	@n1kofi	464	427	2	0,1	0	0,01
175	@aizensou	13	13	10	3,46	0,04	0,01
176	@berkah	18	18	28	3,78	0,04	0,01
177	@allasyummyfood	13	13	10	2,44	0,03	0,01
178	@pkattera	13	13	10	6,03	0,06	0,01
179	@banjo	407	353	2	0,16	0	0,01
180	@anyx	13	13	10	3,61	0,04	0,01
181	@lukestokes	2	2	100	14,5	0,15	0,01
182	@stephen.king989	358	324	0	0,12	0	0,01
183	@dirkzett-english	6	6	100	5,96	0,06	0,01
184	@decibel	368	332	2	0,1	0	0,01
185	@richman	13	13	10	2,64	0,03	0,01
186	@resiliencia	35	34	9	1,61	0,02	0,01
187	@ohamdache	327	308	1	0,16	0	0,01
188	@osmanbugra	21	19	45	2,9	0,03	0,01
189	@jesta	87	26	0	1,74	0,02	0,01
190	@konti	358	324	1	0,1	0	0,01
191	@ramengirl	3	3	18	27,44	0,29	0,01
192	@freeyourmind	3	3	100	18,18	0,19	0,01
193	@snowflake	3	3	100	18,52	0,2	0,01
194	@eternal.witness	46	36	6	1,62	0,02	0,01
195	@tommyhansen	5	3	90	11,68	0,12	0,01
196	@steemprentice	361	327	0	0,19	0	0,01
197	@abishai	119	117	4	0,51	0,01	0,01
198	@licklake	61	29	10	1,21	0,01	0,01
199	@moisesmcardona	75	71	8	0,86	0,01	0,01
200	@vcelier	4	4	30	16,47	0,17	0,01

Now you know all these heroes. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit. These people keep the majority of the newcomers on the platform and give them hope.

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

#statistics #stats #steemit-stats #steemit