Methods of absolute (direct and chronometric) age determination : Part 2 - Potassium-argon dating and other Radioactive dating Methods

in #archaeology7 years ago (edited)

Methods of absolute (direct and chronometric) age determination : Part 2 - Potassium-argon dating and other Radioactive dating Methods 

Image Source

Potassium -argon dating

This method is very similar to radiocarbon dating. It is based on the decay of radioactive material into a non-radioactive substance at a fixed rate. The rate of radioactive potassium (40K)into argon (40Ar) can be measured since it is known that 40K has a half-life of 1.3 billion years. 

Image Source

Potassium/argon dating (often abbreviated as K/Ar) is an absolute dating technique based on the known rate at which potassium changes to argon in volcanic sediments.More specifically it is based on the rate at which potassium and radioactive argon change into stable argon gas.


Volcanic materials are especially suitable for dating purposes. Potassium-argon dating has been applied to determine the age of early fossil hominins found in association with volcanic layers in East Africa. For example, remains of Australopithecus boisei from Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania have been dated to 1.75 million years ago on the basis of this method ranges from the origins of the earth to 100 000 years ago.


The scientific principles on which the method is based

Image Source

~ Potassium-argon (K/Ar) dating and dendrochronology are, like radiocarbon, examples of absolute (chronometric) dating methods.

~ This method of dating is based on the disintegration of radioactive potassium (40K) into non-raddioactive argon (40Ar) at a fixed and measurable rate.

~ Potassium (K) is present in most minerals and in its natural form contains a small proportion of radioactive 40K atoms.

~ 40K has a half-life of 1.3 billion years and for every 100 40K atoms that decay, 11 atoms become 40Ar, which is an inactive gas.

~ This inactive gas (40Ar) escapes by diffusion when lava and other igneous rocks are formed and the amount of 40AAr consequently drops to almost nothing. The 40K continues to decay at this fixed and measurable rate and new concentrations of 40Ar start to accumulate in the rock. In the case of volcanic rock the 40Ar remains trapped in the rock.

~ Spectrometer is used to measure the 40Ar which has accumulated in the rock as a result of decay of 40K and this information is used to determine the age of the rock.

~ It is important to note that the dates obtained refer to the age of the volcanic material. Archaeological remains associated with periods of volcanic activity can be dated through association with the volcanic material. The collection of datable archaeological samples, the laboratory procedures and the limitations of the method

~ Potassium -argon (K/Ar) dating and dendrochronology are like radiocarbon, examples of absolute (chronometric) dating methods.

~ This method of dating is based on the disintegration of radioactive potassium (40k) into non- radioactive potassium (40K) into non-radioactive argon (40Ar) at a fixed and measurable rate.

~ Potassium (K) is present in most minerals and in its natural form contains a small proportion of radioactive 40K atoms.

~ 40K has a half-life of 1.3 billion years and for every 100 40K atoms that decay, 11 atoms become 40Ar, which is an inactive gas.

~ This inactive gas (40Ar) escapes by diffusion when lava and other igneous rocks are formed and the amount of 40Ar consequently drops to almost nothing. The 40K continues to decay at this fixed and measurable rate and new concentrations of 40Ar start to accumulate in the rock. In the case of volcanic rock the 40Ar remains trapped in the rock.

~ A spectrometer is used to measure the 40Ar which has accumulated in the rock as a result of the decay of 40 K and this information is used to determine the age of the rock.

~ It is important to note that the dates obtained refer to the age of the volcanic material. Archaeological remains associated with periods of volcanic activity can be dated through association with the volcanic material.The collection of datable archaeological samples, the laboratory procedures and the limitations of the method

~ It can only be used on volcanic and other igneous rocks.

~ A unique set of conditions is necessary for K/Ar dating. The techniques is specialized and certain procedures have to be followed if the method is to be reliable.The relationship between lava deposition and archaeological activity must be accurately determined. It is vital that the context of the context of the artefact in relation to the artefact in relation to the volcanic layer is well known. This method is very complex, so an experienced geochronologists (an expert in dating rocks) should take samples at the site.

~ The samples are investigated under microscope to check that there are contamination and then processed and treated through the application of a member of tests. After the argon gas has been isolated, a standard formula is used to determine the age of the sample. 

~ Potassium-argon dating is an absolute method of dating archaeological sites. This means that it determines age of a specific scale or in definite units of time, as in years Before Present or BP. It does not, however, date an archaeological artefact and is, therefore, an indirect form of absolute dating. It can only date a layer of rock associated with an archaeological site or archaeological remains. K/Ar dating can therefore only be used when a clear relationship exists between a site and one or two layers of volcanic rock. The archaeologist therefore needs to be very careful when working out the relationship between the site and the layer of rock, which can be dated by means of potassium-argon dating.

~ K/Ar dating can be used to date archaeological remains between approximately 5 million years (my) and 100 000 years ago. 

~ The deviation for a date, however, is about a quarter of a million years each way. Because of this large standard deviation high accuracy in dating the acrhaeological material is not possible. 

Although statistically it may not be meaningful deviation, it nevertheless limits the accuracy of the dates. According to Renfrew and Bahn (1991:131) it only represents a statistical deviation of approximately 2% of the total age.



Examples of applications in archaeology

Image Source

This is the best method available at present for dating very early archaeological material and it is therefore very relevant to archaeology. Volcanic materials are particularly suited to potassium-argon dating. In East Africa periods of volcanic activity both preceded and covered Early Stone Age deposits and this dating method has been used to determine the age of early fossil hominins found in association with the volcanic material. This dating method is not suitable for the travertines and cave breccias where the early southern African hominins occur and the most reliable estimates used in dating southern African fossils are based on faunal analyses and comparison with dated assemblages from East Africa.


Potassium-argon dating can be used to accurately determine dates from the origins of the earth up to 100 000 years ago. This method has therefore been important in establishing dates that range from more than 4 million years ago for hominin evolution to almost 2 million years ago for artefacts manufactured by humans. Early fossil hominins or sites in East Africa have been dated through association with volcanic material. The most famous example of K/Ar dating was when it was used to date the skull of Australopithecus boisei  (also referred to as Zinjanthropus) from Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania at approximately 1.75 +0.25my (million years). The deviation of a quarter of a million means that the skull could, in fact, be anything from 2my to 1.5my old. K/Ar dating was also used to date Lucy, the well-known Australopithecus afarensis fossil from Hadar in Europe, at over 3my. The stone tools recovered from Koobi Fora in northern Kenya were dated to approximately 2.5my, which represents one of the earliest dates for the manufacture of stone tools.


Other Radioactive clocks

There are number of radioactive clocks that cover the time span between radiocarbon dating and potassium-argon dating. Three of the most widely used in archaeology are:

Image Source

Uranium-series dating (1 million to 50 000 years ago)

This method, which is based on the radioactive decay of isotopes of uranium, covers the period 1 000 000 - 50 000 years ago. It is used to date rocks rich in calcium carbonate, for examples stalagmites found in lime stone caves where early humans lived, as well as teeth that have absorbed water - soluble uranium. Two radioactive isotopes of the element uranium, namely U238 and U235 into (Th230) and protactinium (Pa231). These daughter elements are also subject to radioactive decay and their half-lives are known. By measuring the ratio of the parent uranium isotopes and their daughter elements, usually the Th230/U238 ratio, the age of the calcareous deposits, and thus the associated archaeological finds, can be determined.

Fission-track dating (3 million to 100 000 years ago)

This absolute dating method is based on the spontaneous fission of an isotope of uranium (U238) in a wide range of rocks and minerals such as obsidian, pumice, zircon, apatite, and mica, as well as obsidian and  other volcanic glasses. When U238 divides into half during fission, the halves move apart at high speed and cause much damage to structure in their path. These pathways of damage, which are referred to as fission tracks, can be counted under an optical microscope and provide a key to determining the age of the mineral or glass. The older the sample, the more tracks it will display. The method has been used to date geological samples containing some of the earliest hominin fossils found at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. Though time-consuming, it has also been applied to date artificial glass and pottery glazes less than 2000 years old.

Thermoluminescence dating

Through this method, generally known as TL dating, inorganic material such as pottery and burnt flint can be dated. Materials with a crystalline structure contain radioactive material such as uranium, thorium and potassium. As they decay, electrons are displaced which are then trapped in the crystalline matrix. When the clay is fired to 5008 degrees celsius or more,the electrons are released as thermoluminescent light and the radioactive clock is set to zero. The amount of time that has elapsed since the last heating of the material, that is since the pot was fired, can be counted by reheating the clay in the laboratory. TL dating is regarded as less accurate than radiocarbon dating, but can potentially be used to date burnt stone artefacts made more than 40 000 years ago, as well as ceramics produced within the last few thousand years .

Thermoluminescence dating is based on the premise that energy becomes trapped in objects when they are heated to very high temperatures. Reheating the objects releases stored energy in the form of light in a way that can determine the length of time since the object was originally heated. TL is most commonly used for dating ceramics, but stone tools have also been dated with this technique.

 Thank you for reading

References: Renfrew & Bahn 

                          Fagan 

Part 3 to follow.....

Please Follow me for more on Archaeology and History.

Please check out my other posts:

 

Methods of absolute (direct and chronometric) age determination : Part 1 - Radiocarbon or 14C Method

Methods of Relative (Indirect) Age Determination used in Archaeology : Part 3

Methods of Relative (Indirect) Age Determination used in Archaeology : Part 2

Methods of Relative (Indirect) Age Determination used in Archaeology : Part 1 - Introduction

The Preservation of an Archaeological Site : Part 2

The Preservation of an Archaeological Site : Part 1

Discovering your own Archaeological Site : Part 3

Discovering your own Archaeological Site : Part 2

Discovering your own Archaeological Site : Part 1

Archaeological Sealed Sites and River Deposits : Is it an Archaeological Site or Not? - Part 3

Caves, Rock Shelters and Larger Open-Air Sites : Is it an Archaeological Site or Not? - Part 2I

s it an Archaeological Site or Not? - Part 1

Understanding the Archaeological Record : The Aims and Subject Matter of Archaeology - Part 2

The Aims and Subject Matter of Archaeology - Part 1

Archaeology and the Natural Sciences

Archaeology and History

Introduction to Ethnographic Analogy and Ethnoarchaeology

Archaeology and Anthropology

The Nature and Scope of Archaeology

The Three - Age System : The Stone Age, The Bronze Age and The Iron Age

The Roots of Modern Archaeology

Significant 18th and 19th Centuries Discoveries in Archaeology

Archaeology as a Profession- Part 2

Archaeology as a Profession- Part 1

To Become or Not Become an Archaeologist? - Introduction to Archaeology Part 2

Introduction to Archaeology

Please Upvote and Resteem.

Thank You!                   




Sort:  

Upvoted and Resteemed by xx-votesplus, the dropAhead curation team!

Do you want more earnings?

By doing things above you will give us more STEEM POWER (SP) to give YOU more earnings.

Keep up the good work!


Most recent post: Moving #25_votes_plus to Discord

I remember a lab classes I was holding, where students observed the 40K line in a detector. I amde a super stupid joke at that time.

I asked the students not to open the detector (it was a kind of closed cylinder), and we discussed the 40K line they observed. I told them this line may come from the bones of one of them, and that I have thus two bad news for them: first, this is the proof one the students opened the detector. Second, this student is radioactive. One of them started to feel really really bad. (For my defense, I was 25 at that time, and thus young and stupid.) :D

OMG!!!!
@lemouth, you are lucky none of them claimed they changed into the Incredible HULK, actually that's a pretty awesome joke from a lecturers perspective that is :)
Thank you so much for reading my post, I was really concerned with the wording.
I don't think the word "stupid" can ever be used in the characterization of a particle physicist, well certainly not you, that is just my opinion :)

Really, it is good. Don't worry :)

I'm happy to see all your posts on archaelogical dating methods @zest. It's a topic I've been meaning to explore deeper for some time. Unfortunately motivated largely because of conversations I have with people who claim it is all bogus.

Hey @foundation, Thank you so much for the support and comment, when it comes to science , the beauty of it , is that it opens up conversations between individuals that lead to further investigations which thereafter result in the facts being documented so that other individuals may refer to these findings. When an investigation is fact based the discussion of it being bogus becomes insignificant. I hope that my posts helps enlighten those individuals that claim it is bogus.

It is bogus. K/Ar dating FAILED on samples of known age

can you post the source @mikka?

Not sure about the EXACT source, but the story is very famous: the rock that got dated by this very method to 250 000 years. It came from the eruption in the eleventh century on Hawaii islands. As a matter of fact they knew exact year it happened.

This post has received a 3.57 % upvote from @buildawhale thanks to: @trumpman. Send 0.100 or more SBD to @buildawhale with a post link in the memo field to bid on the next vote.

To support our curation initiative, please vote on my owner, @themarkymark, as a Steem Witness

@trumpman, you amazingly kind soul, thank you so much buddy for the constant support , I am truly humbled. Catch up with you in SteemSTEM.

lol, it's nothing stop thanking me :P I really hope you get curated too by buildawhale and get some more exposure. You are definitely worth it ^_^

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.20
JST 0.033
BTC 93762.05
ETH 3095.20
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.01