You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Art Plagiarism: Frida Kahlo by Daio
On what grounds do you manitize my paintings?
I forbid to use my art in my posts !!!
I, AS AN AUTHOR, DO NOT PERSONALLY USE MY PERSONAL ART !!!
On what grounds do you manitize my paintings?
I forbid to use my art in my posts !!!
I, AS AN AUTHOR, DO NOT PERSONALLY USE MY PERSONAL ART !!!
Thank you for removing my art! And do not use my art anymore!
! Leave me alone!
Stop creating lots of pages and vote for yourself!
And finally learn that plagiarism is the appropriation of someone else's work !!!
its ok now? :)
the fact that you deleted my art - yes
The fact that you accuse me of plagiarism is not! :)
the fact is that even after the conversation with @logic you are pretending to be the original author of a work that doesn't really belong to you, I don't really understand if you don't get it or if you do it on purpose.. you can't make copies of an artwork and pretending to call it "my art", especially without mentioning the source, in particular when this is copyrighted. This is as if after taking a Rihanna song and accelerating a little the beating I published it and say: here is my music. Do you think it would be right?
I put in the source!
There are many of these sources!
so ok? :) I was asked to draw Frida Kahlo ! if I paint a picture, it means that this is my work but not my idea! This is an artistic reciprocity! But I understood you! I inserted the source not on the model, but on the photo from where I found it! right?
Not exactly, in the source you have reported an image that someone reported on pinterest, the real source is this one. As you can also see by browsing the artist's website It is a copyrighted work, which the artist does not give free, but sells. So in order to create a work derived from this you should have Nettsch's permission. Otherwise, gaining through a derivative work is absolutely wrong, and liable to be legally persecuted.
oops))))I was inspired by this photo, not someone's art!
Good, now do the same for all your work!!!!
Good luck!!
don't insult my intelligence, in your first article you make clear reference to this page In which Nettsch's painting is clearly visible, And don't waste time changing it because thanks to the blockchain I can still see what was written before and all the changes you make. Don't think I'm an idiot because I assure you it's not like that. Look at the position of the parrots, it is obviously the same as Nettsch's painting, very different from the photography you showed
Spam!
jaguarista (49) · 14 часов назад
don't insult my intelligence, in your first article you make clear reference to this page In which Nettsch's painting is clearly visible, And don't waste time changing it because thanks to the blockchain I can still see what was written before and all the changes you make. Don't think I'm an idiot because I assure you it's not like that. Look at the position of the parrots, it is obviously the same as Nettsch's painting, very different from the photography you showed
$0.00
6 голосов
Ответить
I also have a question, just out of curiosity. Why is this site selling these paintings? They sell a portrait, but they do not have permission to earn money on Frida Kahlo’s face!
Frida Kahlo's face is not protected by copyright, but her works are