You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Now why would kafkanarchy do this?
So here is what I don't get. If there was any action to be done to a child, it would have been done by you or someone you hired, as Ben never requested any such action in what is public. So how are you not the person being held responsible? There was no order from Ben to cause any harm to anyone, the only place that is ever listed is a list you sent to Kafka, a message in which Ben was not connected to.
So those screen caps were Ben?
And this individual has explained clearly what was taken out of context and twisted.
I was presented as some evil bad guy by Koke campaign/Farmer to individual who launches counter campaigns against malevolent parties.
Infosec warned Ben that sometimes children get dragged in to these wars and that this has nothing to do with the matter at hand (making him aware of the gravity of launching a cyber attack/discouraging the action insofar as it could drag children in). Ben says “just keep that to yourself.”
Again, are you saying the screens were Ben?