Sorry, I don't do videos, I just don't like it. I reacted to the headline. If you said differently in the video, than congratulations on the clickbait.
If not, change your headline, because it implies that the kill was done because of the tribes property concept..
You say in the headlien that property is not a waestern concept, but universal, and you refer to the misionary.
Why else would the missionary be in there if not as an example for "see, the first part is true"??
Sorry, I don't do videos, I just don't like it. I reacted to the headline. If you said differently in the video, than congratulations on the clickbait.
If not, change your headline, because it implies that the kill was done because of the tribes property concept..
Clickbait?
And no, it may imply that to your perception, but that was not my intent.
I do have a good idea about how to fix it, though.
You say in the headlien that property is not a waestern concept, but universal, and you refer to the misionary.
Why else would the missionary be in there if not as an example for "see, the first part is true"??
I wanted to let folks know I would be talking about the missionary story.