Can you finance a million dollar campaign house while we stalk people? @AdamKokesh, @BenFarmer
Seems your campaign staff was fine with exercising shady power over people.
New information from the infosec professional/source.
@marcus.pulis, @benfarmer, @adamkokesh -
Will you continue to censor, mock, and deride me, or will you address the allegations?
~KafkA
Graham Smith is a Voluntaryist activist, creator, and peaceful parent residing in Niigata City, Japan. Graham runs the "Voluntary Japan" online initiative with a presence here on Steem, as well as DLive and Twitter. (Hit me up so I can stop talking about myself in the third person!)
Support Voluntary Japan!
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/voluntaryjapan
Steem/SBD: @voluntaryjapan
BCH: qqvmdr3l0dlmjqdekkzgsdeg8hq2s9zt5ud3h004r7
BTC: 1MfENEp9tkJMHmrrj5rPKzohYNCw9S6qFw
ETH: 0x9199c3844fd8d3642b39175414c8ffcd403c7aaf
DSH: XpqAkZqHnE12pN9oKapd1Vmj91HSeb93K1
QTUM: 0x9199c3844fd8d3642b39175414c8ffcd403c7aaf
Remind me to never get on your bad side bro! :D
Heh. As long as you don’t try to ruin my life, we should be cool bro ;) Lol
Sounds fair.
Quite great
What is “quite great” about this, in your view?
I love the image like it wink, but am very sorry if you don't like the manner i used
But we already knew they are using the donations as personal funds. Another page from the original Kokesh playbook dating back to the beginning of his "activism". Why stop if it keeps working over and over again? Except this time you cost them some of that which they feel entitled to.
worry about your own shit, you will be happier.
This is my own shit.
stop wiping your ass on the internet then. nobody cares
Okay, now my interest is even more piqued. Was the complaint on Ripoff Report filed by the Grey Hat who makes it their business to destroy the reputation of people as you outlined in this post?
If this report was filed by that person. Does that mean that that person works for the company who makes the Zone Alarm Software as the report suggests? Check Point in San Carlos California? The reason I ask is because the service provided seems shady as all hell in the first place. So the very idea that this company would have problems doing business with people because their money may not be above board seems doubtful to me.
It would seem to me that services like the above would be remunerated in some kind of untraceable crypto? Unless of course, all of the above things are actually legal to do to someone? If on the other hand the person does not work for Check Point in San Carlos like the report indicates doesn't that make the report a false flag in a sense? Hijacking the name of a credible organization to attack a political candidate? I still don't know what to believe here, yet the more you post about it the more interesting the saga becomes.
It's starting to seem like a whispering campaign to me, or maybe a counter whispering campaign? Ultimately, if there is a there there, and you can take legal action against someone for conspiracy to commit a crime then your claims become infinitely more credible to folks who may still be skeptical or on the fence. On the other hand it's public knowledge that you didn't like Kokesh before you learned of this alleged conspiracy against you. So someone could be setting you up to attack Kokesh even more vehemently than you would have otherwise in order to damage his chances if he's even still running at this point?
You’ve crossed the wires in a couple places. I’m not sure where you are getting the “Zone Alarm” thing.
The doxxing/hacking may or may not have been approached via the company’s official resources themselves. However, the 1.1 million requested for the house was being requested through company connections. Does that make sense?
My claims are credible because I am telling the truth about what has been revealed to me. Perhaps you mean the claims of the infosec pro are not. I’d like to know why you think they are not.
Legal action is being taken. Thank you.
Already considered the 4-D chess stuff.
Edit: I gotcha! Zone Alarm made by this company:
https://www.checkpoint.com/about-us/contact-us/
What specifically, is questionable about the legitimacy of this company in your estimation?
I’m not saying you are wrong, just wondering.
Edit 2: My disagreements with the Kokesh campaign were about logic and ideas. It was only when I challenged these that the personal attacks from his end began.
The company who filed the complaint on Ripoff Report is listed as Check Point in San Carlos. When I Google it, it appears to be the company that creates the Zone Alarm software. They are a popular company and credible company to me. So it seems unlikely that they would be involved in the type of activity that the grey hat is involved in. All of that seems like highly illegal stuff to me. If the Zone Alarm company is behind that type of behavior, that alone would be pretty mind-blowing stuff. I'm not saying your claims are not credible, I just wonder if the person who contacted you is above board. I doubt they really work for Check Point as the report seems to indicate. If they don't work for Check Point they're using the name of a credible company to lodge a complaint against a candidate who is running for political office. Seems almost equally as shady as the type of stuff that Farmer allegedly tried to get them to do. Hopefully, I comprehended everything in context.
Edit 1:
Yeah, that was another thing that I didn't understand. If Farmer was allegedly trying to get them to do a dirty deed against you. It would seem that he would have to pay them. So I don't know why their company would need to pay his campaign 1.1m? It all seems pretty tangled up, maybe there's just more to it that I'm not seeing. I think I've read most of your posts on this. Why would Farmer (if he done it) need money from them, if they were the ones allegedly providing a service? Unless they had multiple different levels on which they did or do business with him?
White hat. And yes, I clarified this above. This would not have been done “officially.”
The request for money (1.1 mil) to be sent to the PAC was made to the company/company’s banking connections, however.
They did/do.
Well, they work/worked for Check Point. And exposing actual financial malfeasance is hardly as “shady” as threatening to ruin someone’s life.
What I don't understand is why would their company owe Farmer 1.1m?
When I said shady, it sounded to me that that's what the white/grey hat does for a living is destroys people? Did I assess that part incorrectly? Or are they like a moral hacker who only destroys people who deserve it in exchange for money?
They didn’t. Farmer allegedly requested it for a “campaign house”
Ugh, this is all too deep and muddled for me. It sounds like something worthy of writing an in depth and detailed post around. I've got only so many pieces of the puzzle and haven't connected enough together to see a clear image of what is what.
It's almost as if the white hat is like a hacker for hire and had a very close relationship with these people. Am I at least understanding that part correctly? If so, does that close relationship entail a whole lot more than all of those bullet points that you detailed in your previous post. Like going into the realm of financial stuff too?
This is all very cloak and dagger and reminds me of a video game called uplink. In the game you play the role of a hacker and accept or deny jobs based on your ethics. The game was put out in 2001 and based on the internet of the 80's. Now, I'm starting to think it was way more reality based than I initially thought. It's probably happening all the time behind the scenes.
The game sounds fun!
I have just clarified with the source. Let me do my best to demystify this as much as possible, without compromising anyone's security:
The infosec professional would NOT have been acting in an official capacity with Check Point to doxx me, etc.
The individual may or may not work with Check Point currently, but has connections with much larger firms as well.
The proposal for the questionable channeling of funds, however, was to be done through official channels, which is why this association never materialized and a large part of the reason reports were filed.
I hope that helps a bit. The individual works in high echelons of power/clout and as such was surprised to discover the "nefarious" target was just a blogger, and not the monster I was made out to be.
Also, as an aside, the silence from @BenFarmer and the campaign raises big red flags. If someone spoofed your number, wouldn't you want to know, and remedy that immediately? Irreparable social damage can be done with this capability.
No money was exchanged. Whether it would have been is uncertain. The hacker does not do this stuff “officially”