you (kafka) have a friend that you conceal and protect who is also a russian cyber terrorist. she does (according to you) all of these things:
but now... after i specifically said that i know who this cyber terrorist is AND assured her i wouldn't doxx her...
THEN... was told that i was absolutely wrong about who she is...
NOW she feels threatened? that. is. retarded.
but just to clarify: I have no intention to do any violation of the NAP towards her in any way. I have no intentions to doxx her OR do any of the things that she listed above that she does to others. Tell her not to be afraid of me. I will do her no harm. that's who she is... it's not who i am.
I WILL of course get to the truth and have justice. I WILL unwind all the bullshit lies that you two are weaving. k?
I’m not sure how you know who I am. I don’t know the person in the picture you posted and certainly do NOT know you. If you're claiming to know me, it would be through Ben, which makes his whole campaign complicit in attempting to recruit me to bully and doxx a blogger. I’m not going to argue semantics over the evidence I provided. If you think I’m a “Russian Cyber Terrorist” then have your campaign seek legal recourse. I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games in which you “claim” to know me and then say you won’t doxx me. That statement is a contradiction. If you know me, then you wouldn’t need to doxx me. The fact that you’re using that term loosely is suggestive of an underlying threat. I would like you to also stop harassing Graham, as he was only provided evidence and has no affiliation to my employer. I have no political affiliation to the United States so there is no agenda. If you feel threatened by the opinions or the legitimate claims that someone is posting online, then repudiate them or point out the lack of evidence. Exposing someone’s identity who has chosen to be pseudonymous is wrong. Exposing them just because you feel your worldview is threatened by their speech is especially wrong. I am no longer going to play this exposure game that you’re attempting to play. Doxxing is a grave sin and it is disturbing to see so many people tolerate it here. Pseudonymity is important for the Internet and has long been important for people even predating the Internet. Many folks on social media are pseudonymous, for good reason. Arguing on steemit with random people is just futile masochism. Doxxing them is equally futile, and it’s unethical and harmful. Steemit arguments are a great way to trick yourself into thinking you’re doing something when really you’re doing nothing. If you’re in the mood to fight someone, you might as well play Xbox instead. It’s a lot more fun.
No RCs. They need to let them recharge.
lemme make sure that i've got this straight...
you (kafka) have a friend that you conceal and protect who is also a russian cyber terrorist. she does (according to you) all of these things:
but now... after i specifically said that i know who this cyber terrorist is AND assured her i wouldn't doxx her...
THEN... was told that i was absolutely wrong about who she is...
NOW she feels threatened? that. is. retarded.
but just to clarify: I have no intention to do any violation of the NAP towards her in any way. I have no intentions to doxx her OR do any of the things that she listed above that she does to others. Tell her not to be afraid of me. I will do her no harm. that's who she is... it's not who i am.
I WILL of course get to the truth and have justice. I WILL unwind all the bullshit lies that you two are weaving. k?
k
:)
I’m not sure how you know who I am. I don’t know the person in the picture you posted and certainly do NOT know you. If you're claiming to know me, it would be through Ben, which makes his whole campaign complicit in attempting to recruit me to bully and doxx a blogger. I’m not going to argue semantics over the evidence I provided. If you think I’m a “Russian Cyber Terrorist” then have your campaign seek legal recourse. I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games in which you “claim” to know me and then say you won’t doxx me. That statement is a contradiction. If you know me, then you wouldn’t need to doxx me. The fact that you’re using that term loosely is suggestive of an underlying threat. I would like you to also stop harassing Graham, as he was only provided evidence and has no affiliation to my employer. I have no political affiliation to the United States so there is no agenda. If you feel threatened by the opinions or the legitimate claims that someone is posting online, then repudiate them or point out the lack of evidence. Exposing someone’s identity who has chosen to be pseudonymous is wrong. Exposing them just because you feel your worldview is threatened by their speech is especially wrong. I am no longer going to play this exposure game that you’re attempting to play. Doxxing is a grave sin and it is disturbing to see so many people tolerate it here. Pseudonymity is important for the Internet and has long been important for people even predating the Internet. Many folks on social media are pseudonymous, for good reason. Arguing on steemit with random people is just futile masochism. Doxxing them is equally futile, and it’s unethical and harmful. Steemit arguments are a great way to trick yourself into thinking you’re doing something when really you’re doing nothing. If you’re in the mood to fight someone, you might as well play Xbox instead. It’s a lot more fun.