Are you ready to be Free?

in #anarchy6 years ago (edited)

10F1292A-E542-47C7-A0A1-7D8C8EA09E94.gif

This blog entry is dedicated to everyone who has argued with me as a statist or as an anarchist. I’ve tried defending both point of views. This is the result. Many thanks to, Adam Kokesh, Brian from High Impact Flix, Lord Coondog, Ida Foxy Queen, and even indirectly Larken Rose.

My mind is free. Do you want the Red Pill too? We may have found the One already. His name is Adam Kokesh and he’s running for president in 2020.

https://steemit.com/@adamkokesh

But Do you want to dispel the illusions of government as well?? If so, Keep reading.

Freedom requires fealty to absolute morality. The camels nose of “Exceptions” from absolute morality, even for great benefits, destroys it all.

The need for Government is an illusion created and perpetrated by those who mean to rule over others.

If you’re searching for “how” to fix government, your question is premature. The first question should be “why”. Once you truly come to terms with “why” and if it’s not to get free stuff at the expense of others, you’ll want voluntarism instead, as the norm. When you’re ready to become free then you’ll also be ready to spread the good news; and eventually the consensus you worked to build and defended as a statist, so fervently, will naturally build a consensus of voluntarists.

You’ve been searching for a better way. Somehow you knew deep down inside that that political consensus building aimed at taxation to fill public coffers, deprives everyone of their money and property. That feeling is where we begin to explore the illusions of consensus. The illusion of the consent of the governed vs the pained reality of absolute morality.

Eventually, peacefully and naturally, we will create the “How”; and the creation will be based on absolute morality instead of the concepts of conquest and force of arms, as is the norm today.

Absolute morality is unconditional respect for other people’s lives, property and treasure; not to protect them from themselves. Not to expect that if enough people say it’s ok to take anything from another person that it’s really ok, legitimate or moral. The act of Causing Involuntary sharing is not altruistic, legitimate or even close to moral. Call me selfish? I’ll call you a fool because altruism is the back bone of absolute morality.

All of my contemplation of opposing concepts of conquest and voluntarism have finally come to a head.

Voluntarism has won. Morality exists. It’s real. And It can be found in books. For me, it started with Adam Kokesh’s Book FREEDOM to gain an insight into self ownership and then on to even more books and videos on Anarchy, Voluntarism, Agorism, and Libertarianism. There is a library of books to choose from. To learn to be free... Have at it!

But, In all of these books we can find Concepts to live by but no perfect blueprint to make it happen. That has to come naturally as a grass roots, peaceful rebellion, against being ruled as subjects of an empire.

If we could already conceive how to create the perfect government we would have it already. If we could already conceive how to create a totally voluntary society we would have one.

Since there is no perfect government, we should not have any. We must be personally and simply governed by the absolute morality described above and in more detail in books.

Codified Statutes do not determine morality and cannot be micromanaged by codes and ordinances. Absolute morality is necessary for true freedom to flourish.

Everything I hear statists present, and I use to present myself, are all in line with the indoctrination of us by our school systems. Sorrowfully most of us do not even recognize that the current paradigm is based on conquest and force of arms; accepting them as the norm and fighting for them without even realizing why! They do so while making up as many straw-man arguments to defend the violence and its benefits, as there are people on Earth.

While all of the fearful concepts of “Human Nature” are real, and the law of the jungle exists; kill or be killed; it exists because our society still respects the Right and Rule of Conquest and Conquistadores.

George Washington and his merry band of thieves conquered the territories of the United States, by force of arms, treaty and purchase, but instead of another monarchy, the founding fathers gave themselves a republic that is supposed to respect people’s lives, property and treasure. It never has though, immediately instituting taxation to pay the war debts. And property taxes as protection fees from the indigenous claims; and whiskey taxes to operate the extortion racket of an Empire that should have never been created in the first place. ( The Federalists usurped the power).

https://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2012/10/do-you-know-constitution-unconstitutional

The violence of Conquest is still the basis for title insurance companies to insure land titles.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/26/511/case.html

People strive to defend the tenants of our public education and “fee simple” land ownership allowing the Government to retain its illegitimate control over it all. They allow the consensus to build to such levels, with force of arms, so threatening that no one can disobey.

We all strive to be free but some never realize it is the mental bonds created BY (emphasis added) the current system which prevents us from creating a voluntary society of free individuals and families.

Others who have been able to dispel those violent dystopian tenants don’t yet know exactly how to get to a voluntary society or how one will work.

No one has a blueprint. But we know some things that should not be allowed to happen; things that government should be restricted from doing; yet when people hear the truth they cower in fear of the unknown; desperately searching for ideas how to fix the current paradigm instead, creating straw-men with even less of a clue, having never been able to see where true freedom comes from in the first place.

Congress must be disbanded in its current form that claims power over our lives. Population levels have grown to a ratio of 750,000 people for everyone ‘one’ representative. Our voices are muted at this level, and given the constitution’s recommended ratio of 1:30,000, it is illegitimate by its own guidelines. The current ratio allows the special interests to control every election and every bill considered by congress. This is pure tyranny by taxation without adequate representation. I use to call for the expansion of congressional seats to fix this issue but it’s pointless until they can no longer write laws of forced taxation and until they can no longer create laws which create rules for victimless crimes. There should NOT be black market in a free society.

The laws they have created have caused the middle class to be surrounded by 25 million entitlement addicts and the 435 people charged with protecting my freedom and my treasure can't hear me over the Communist powwows being screamed above all else as we cover our wagons and hunker down until the Calvary comes..... they are coming aren't they??? Aren't they??? Instead they pass laws that violate their own constitutional rules of privacy by requiring us and our employers to submit evidence of our own income and “allowable” deductions. What a farce! But we all pay because of the consensus building force of arms against ourselves. This is pure insanity. Is it not?

We are the Calvary. Voluntarists Spreading the gospel of peaceful freedom.

There is no perfect fix for our government; except by ending Taxation; disbanding congress, as it no longer operates with our consent; and to turn the courts into privately funded but elected arbitration realms; turning away from opinion statutes into sound rules of voluntary and absolute morality found in our trusted books. Like the English language has rules but no one to enforce grammar except our trusted books; for a simple analogy.

Slavery based on genetics was abolished because it was an absolutely abhorrent institution. It was abolished without regard for the economy or so to speak without regard for “but who will pick the cotton?”. Likewise Taxation, as instituted today, is as abhorrent as Slavery of old was.

It must be abolished for the same reasons with the same fervor, also without regard for who will build the roads.

Arguing the consequences of abolition is pointless. It’s like arguing the benefits of violence.

Once the rule is set, the market will adapt itself voluntarily. It did before and can do it again.

Are you ready for the Red Pill yet? Follow the White Rabbit.

Click on the photo link below. Therein lies your escape from the illusion of being governed and enslaved by a consensus of percentages, pollsters and force of arms.

Sort:  

The act of Causing Involuntary sharing is not altruistic, legitimate or even close to moral.

Which is exactly why “the One’s” plan for centralized management of property/resources is illegitimate, in view of Voluntaryist property ethic.

I dunno. He may not like me referring to him as the One who will free us all from the government..... we shall see.

Well, @adamkokesh can't free us but if he reaches enough people with the truthful message, the people could free themselves.

There's virtually no ill we face that is not a result of government. Dismantling the Federal Government is the only answer I can see. It's the primary instrument used by the elite to control the people and use them to steal and murder, all for a paycheck and perhaps a belief in an illusion.

Adam's leading the charge on spreading this message and I'll help him anyway I can to spread the word to get folks to question whether government should be allowed to exist at all.

I'm definitely voting no to government. Man governs man to man's own injury. ( I don't know where I got that quote from)

oh, btw, great post. :)

spooner.jpg

Adam's leading the charge on spreading this message and I'll help him anyway I can to spread the word to get folks to question whether government should be allowed to exist at all.

He’s not spreading the message, but changing it. He already has, and is attempting to use an illegitimate, violence-based state mechanism to bring about peace, and the end of state mechanisms. It’s not only absurd, it’s detrimental to the real message of sound property and self-ownership, and further perpetuated the myth that we need some sort of “political hero” to bend the rules within the system and save us. As his plan necessitates the violation of individual self-ownership, it is not legitimate in view of Voluntaryist principle.

If @adamkokesh gets his way, the Federal Government will be no more.

You identify as an anarchist.

full stop

Adam plans to implement centralized policy based not on individual self-ownership or free market conceptions of property, but on arbitrary deliberataion made by himself and a centralized group of “custodians.” Full stop. Your superficial understanding of what it means to me to be an anarchist is limiting your ability to raise any sort of valid counterpoint in this discussion to points I have raised.

That's not true and those questions have been answered over and over again. Go back and read my summary of your debate with Adam.

No thanks. And no they haven’t. I thought you were a different account at first l, which is why I engaged again. I realize who this is now. So. Have a nice day.

Thanks man! It was only recently that I saw the light. Have a good one.

@kafkanarky84 only one complaint and no upvote? What’s up? ;)

I really like how you think and I respect you a lot! I just cannot support anything that supports a position philosophically antithetical to individual self-ownership. Kokesh is not a Voluntaryist, but a politician.

"Freedom, in a political context, has only one meaning: the absence of physical coercion."
Ayn Rand

Is requiring the participation in the BIGGEST Ponzi Scheme in the world, to "live" what you'd call
.............................................................'physical coercion'?

FiatBye3.jpg

What was Ayn Rand’s relationship to the Modern Rand Corp.?

I truly don't know, but she's marked L. Peikoff as her philosophical successor and he founded Ayn Rand Institute.

Is there a Purple Pill choice? Just like a Devil to want both. Nah I live the truth of the red pill. I don't like diversity, multiculturalism or division all tools of the Bolsheviks. Peace out there Somewhere

I see nothing wrong with respecting other people’s cultures. Not everyone enjoys life the same way. Have a great day!

You appear to quite awake. I would appreciate you take a short survey https://s.surveyplanet.com/H1DAjr9xf .

对于政治不是很了解!只有给你点个赞同了!

感谢您的支持!

I also hope that you can check out my blog. My blog is mainly about Chinese food, I hope to bring fun to your life! I also hope that you can give valuable advice and help me to make my blog better!

是的。我订阅了你的博客。这食物看起来很好吃!我们早餐通常吃中餐。你有什么点心款式的食谱吗?

好的明天给你弄几个点心的食谱!

不要把你所有的食谱免费赠送, 在图片上放一张纸条给你. 10 或. 50 或1.0 蒸汽或 SBD 与博客条目 URL 作为备忘录, 然后你上传食谱为他们后, 你得到的收入。

这个不知道怎么制作呀!

我转移了1.0 蒸汽美元。 用甜点食谱做一个帖子。

不要用照片上传食谱。但只写一张纸条给你一个蒸汽美元。然后你给的指示, 使食品后, 你得到了报酬。

教共产党人做资本家可以很有趣! :)

I tried upvoting you 100%, but it wouldn't allow me. Keep doing what you're doing. Very encouraging.
Resteemed.

Greatly appreciate all your hard work and patience in re-educating the public. @krnel is a good Anarchist channel here on steemit if you haven’t already subscribed. Thanks, Andy

To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:

Most likely

Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.

Love the passion you bring here, just love it! "the founding fathers gave themselves a republic that is supposed to respect people’s lives, property and treasure. It never has though"

Been ruminating on very similar line of thinking today as folks blow up fireworks and celebrate an America based on subjugation nd inequality. We are duped into collusion and are ignorant to the wider scope of reality that has us action WAy out of whack of morality. The land of the free and the home of the brave is a great line in a song, but in reality the ruling class is cowardly oppressing the freedom of the citizens.

But where would all the $ for war come from if not from taxes and the "justice" system... Haha we live in a strange world and am glad you're bringing some juice here in this post. thanks for sharing.

No; Thank you for sharing your thoughts too! Have a good night.

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. Mark Skousen

https://steemit.com/anarchy/@evolutionnow/the-land-of-the-delusional-and-the-home-of-the-cowards

Interesting way to put it. Taxation: “The price we pay for failure”. But that kind of legitimizes the conquest. It’s like, don’t fail or the gators are waiting to eat you, this thinking accepts the role of the gators because “it’s their nature”, can’t blame the gator. But the people who collect taxes, aren’t gators. They’re humans trained to be gators. If you get my drift.

Well put. Also this "we" bothers me. Like it is the burden we are supposed to carry together. I'm civilized and fuck off. Go tax yourself ;)

Absolute morality is unconditional respect for other people’s lives, property and treasure

I'd be wary of this. To unconditionally respect other people's lives, property, and treasure is to be a pacifist, as it undercuts an justification for defense of self and property. One can be a voluntarist without being a pacifist, and I'd argue being a pacifist is counter-productive in the extreme.

Point Taken. Replace with “unjustified” ? But that takes back to exceptions.... any suggestions?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.25
JST 0.038
BTC 95511.18
ETH 3313.19
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.30