If there's a human or group of humans attempting to assert their will upon other beings, they are attempting to create a rule system.

Most of all, it is not anarchic anymore by definition. So my point stands. Civilization and anarchy are not mutually exclusive.

Civilization only came about 12k years ago.

I wasn't there, so I refrain from making such statements as if they were fact.

Civilization itself is a cancer upon the planet that concentrates power in the hands of psychopaths.

I disagree with the continued abuse of such broad brushes. Having a toilet, a computer, a roof over my head is civilization to me, and I do not consider these things "cancerous" or a means of concentrating wealth per se.

If you can't see that I'm right, it's because you're either uninformed or ignorant.

This gives us a clear idea how well your take on "true anarchy" is going to work. Let me explain to you my anarchy: the first time you pull this stunt, I kindly beg you to refrain from this sort of needless insult. The second time I demand. The third time I will warn you of the consequences. This is the first time, so pretty please don't insult me.

To be clear: you are trying to assert your will here. You are abusing the power of language you've been given; and exert verbal violence. Practice what you preach if you don't want to be considered a psychopath yourself.

You have now been informed.

No, I have been subjected to the attempt of talking down to me.

Check out lectures from Derrick Jensen, John Zerzan, Christopher Ryan, Arthur Haines, Daniel Vitalis, Daniel Quinn. Maybe try living ethically and sustainably for bit and observing civilization from the outside.

Yes, I will watch these lectures just as you watched yours: from outside civilization, without electricity and laptop, all naked and free out in the wilderness of nature's "true" anarchy.