RE: Adam Kokesh Discussion With Cynthia McKinney at Anarchapulco 2018
yea not sure about the kid texts, wish he would address it, if he really is trying to have a chance in hell at being taken seriously in 20' probably need to address these things whether they are fake or a personal short coming or what. Even the Pussy Grabber called it locker room talk. I know there are steemit commies that don't like links in comments I think it better and dont mind it. If you want to make your arguments clearer and lower search cost.
I thought the discusdsion with Cynthia McKinney was pretty cool. It's a complex thing with Adam Kokesh. Not sure what I think yet. Thinking of starting a vlog if you ever want to chat about anything, or confront me for my own anarchy impurity as a minarchist who supports basic income. Anarchy under NAP is totally possible though and I am not at all against it.
Ah man, I don’t “confront” people just to be a jackass. I initially asked Kokesh some questions about his platform and made criticisms of it, and was told I was an annoying and ignorant troll. Usually when people get defensive and resort to name calling that quickly, it is a signal that something’s amiss.
I’ve mailed him directly about the messages to Angela Fisher’s son but have received no response. There are a million details such as this, and they all trace back to narcissistic type behavior.
My initial gripe was simply—and still is—that I don’t believe his platform is compatible with voluntaryism. Now I am convinced he is a dishonest individual, and is actively damaging the “liberty movement,” and basically scamming good-hearted individuals.
When you make implications that everyone who disagrees with you is “mentally disturbed” or a “state plant” the chances are that something is amiss. He may even be projecting.
Here are some resources:
Threats
Calling on Voluntaryists to “put down the ideology”
Self-upvoting his own flame thread comments at 80 - 100 dollars
Debate in which Kokesh suggests that Federal elections both do and do not grant authority, and that individuals both would and would not have to obey his presidential policies, including possible fingerprinting prior to homesteading unowned lands
Political waffling
Shield Mutual financial conflict