You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What if You Could Help Raise the Prize Pool to 1 Billion $$ DAILY? How Quality Content, Aimed at OUTSIDE Audiences Could be Making us ALL More $$$$
Actually, no. The network is both decentralized and distributed. The servers are nodes run by witnesses. Those witnesses receive sizable salaries to run them. They are also the ones that debug the network and do the bulk of the heavy lifting on dev work. So, a lot of the tools you find around from groups like Busy.org, that's all witness work. They get a couple hundred k a year, in addition to their earnings from here. So, that's ordinarily a great idea, but in this case, it's not really applicable.
It appears. I used the Server for steemit as an example of a start where no one individual would be the benefactor.
For me I wold say , Let us make a start and use my house. that leads to conflicts of interest, which is one thing I wish to avoid. I believe those who begin a project like this, should be rewarded, but rewards capped at a max to be agreed. Where to start is just one thing to be established agreed upon. If a group thinking together are working toward the same goal. That goal been clearly defined, I;m sure agreements can be made with ease. A level of generated income can also be agreed upon before allocating funds to other projects with similar interests of benefit can be pursued.
Got to start somewhere ,
Well, those are interesting ideas. I happen to think a rewards cap is counterproductive. As the pool increases through rise in steem price, that will soon become obsolete.
Rewards cap on the investor to a outside company of Steemit. Conversations are getting mixed some I think,lol. As an exterior company grows and the profits increase, A cap limit there, preventing the increased yearly profit from been filtered to a few. And recycle to other area's like water, housing educations.