ADSactly on ADSACTLY - Creating value Part 6

ojebaba (36) 7 years ago

You are very right in your submission that multinationals grow into Morales's and inhuman monsters, however I don't think restriction on jurisdiction of trade (what you call sales range) is achievable. Reason being that multinationals did not just become what they are, they became giants by consuming their rivals through "quality" of services and goods they rendered. So far people will move from one society which may be jurisdiction of one company to another which is the jurisdiction of another company) news of one quality product will not let the people stick to the one produced close to them. Don't forget sentimental values also have a role to play in this. Chinese people may reject African noddles for theirs because according to them their noddles is the best. This will cause smuggling of product from one society to the other.
What I think they can do is for government to legislate on profit. Sincerely, the idea of profit is the first of all scams the human mind could come up with. Till now nobody determines what percentage should be legally accepted as profit. That is through what common people of this days are swindled. If government legislate profit you make from a locality must not leave that locality, multinational corporations will die a natural death.

brapollo29 (53) 7 years ago

For me we should not value the luxurious cars or anything else that replaces humanity. If corporation would focuses through the pair wellness of both parties, maybe there will less children's starve. We should not deny humans than accepting something. There is no such thing that could replace human. I do believe of @adsactly idea that corporations must limit production and have a high standard through environmental concerns. I suggest that every corporation to be build should look for the environment. In many aspect they could help, maybe by planting tress, or fund home for the elderly, orphanage and for the homeless out there. They deserve to be given an attention. Are you looking for serious economy concerns, well look at they.

motordrive (54) 7 years ago

Good post, I agree with you on most points. Capitalism and greed go hand in hand, and while the production of goods becomes ruthlessly efficient at cutting costs, this also means that for everyday people, they become less relevant if they are too expensive and then replaced. Like you said, first corporations began to consolidate departments within themselves, cutting off the hiring of outside groups to do extra work. Then some time later, jobs are outsourced to other countries which helps those countries develop; however, home country citizens lose jobs. And now with the rise of automation, AI and robots, human labor becomes less relevant as profits soar every higher.

The idea you propose, of localizing resource production to a geographic area, is definitely interesting. It means every area then becomes self sufficient, and giving residents job security as every profession needs a job. But limiting based on geography alone punishes, I think, those who live in remote areas with lower populations, or even simply places that are more suburban in nature.

I'd be more inclined to pursue something that swings the greed pendulum back somewhat. It means higher taxes on profits, probably, but ideally wouldn't destroy the motivation to be successful. Steemit itself has the basic income group; I think profit funded basic income for all people may at least provide everyone with an acceptable minimum standard of living. It's not that we can or should completely eliminate inequality, but we absolutely should make sure that inequality isn't so massive like it is today.

3 votes

moondarker (37) 7 years ago

Enjoyed your commentary, it was very thought provoking

$0.00

lovelyworld (52) 7 years ago

An important writing to be recognized by all the people around the world how one knows how incredibly incredible the competition takes place both in the tremendous oil exploration indeed the various industries today are growing up by sharing the dimensions created by relying on very different readings and qualities
Samun I see various violations occur both than the pollution of the public health environment and the welfare gained by indigenous people living close to the giant company I want to compare with a giant oil company owned by a province that is very well known with the city of petro dollars but not the slightest sense of wisdom is obtained.

A question whether such a concept is built by the owner of the company one of them LNG PT.Aron yang Ada dilokseumawe, from posting that say abaca is a reality that really happened today.

So does the company and board members who are trusted by the public to be the person who conveyed his aspirations but after occupying the position never seen and realized about what has been promised, and just want to get his personal benefits saja.dengan very large salary, life which is real with all-sufficiency that everyone wants to occupy the seat that sangt tender. With all the luxurious living equipment, they have a sports car and other luxuries.
Manun this becomes a must-really controlled society terhadapa competition with the machine like a world turnaround that will be a boomerang for people who do not have the expertise.
From this post to a meeting point for companies in multinational standards I am very interested in posting a meberikan a view that changed the paradigm of an environmentally friendly company.
The view that became a benchmark beforehand how a more human concept.

Thank you @adsactly for a very useful outlook for us people all over the world
Greetings know us from Aceh province Indonesia

broncofan99 (64) 7 years ago

There is a solution but we will not likely see it in our lifetime. Truer words could not have been spoken. The standard has been set and at this point, there is no way that the fat cats with their marionettes are going to let someone else start pulling the strings. There is too much wealth and power at stake and my goodness, what would they do without that extra 10%? It will take a massive paradigm shift in the way the world works in order to see something of true value like this actually happen. What a noble thought indeed, to think that the distribution of wealth could be even, fair and just. Maybe, with any luck, the work we do today to facilitate change will allow our children to reap these kinds of rewards.

1 vote

frank1in (60) 7 years ago

I would say that large corporations are a state within the state. Corporations have a huge impact on various areas of human life. But the main thing is that it's hard for them, and in some cases it's almost impossible to attract to responsibility. Let's remember the last "loud" case with a fake book. After that, when it became clear that Facebook was selling personal information of its users and showed them targeted advertising based on their own interest - what did their fucking CEO do? He just smiled before the senate. Yes, he answered questions, but in the end he "came out of the water." And this is one example of impunity.

And in the case of strong laws restricting corporations, it is still a distant prospect. For example, many corporations have their own charitable foundation that is not taxed. This is an example of circumvention of legislation.

A corporation is a whole organism that feeds on the talents of people. Although this is not always a bad thing. At least for many people this is a chance to find a job. With the advent of decentralization and the block chain, the whole world began to change rapidly. It's like when the Internet first appeared and began to develop widely. You are right in your judgments. Nevertheless, we are still young. I am positive about the changes that are taking place.

A good topic for reflection. Food for brain:)

moondarker (37) 7 years ago

Pretty interesting perspective, do you think that the fact that corporations are considered to have the same rights as individuals have anything to do with this?

$0.00

1 vote

whack.science (71) 7 years ago (edited)

How this system works nowadays is nothing less than awfull! We got greed in every aspect of our lives, especially in coorporations where managers are only interesting in pleaseing owners, no matter the price, so they can have their monthly unfairly earned salary. And that just goes round and round every month, every year.
While they are givin low amounts of time into the projects of the company, they are earning a crazy amount of money. More to that, they are keeping it for themselves and not givin back at least small portion to the community.

That's why I love decentralized open networks where you are respected as anyone and where people are coming together for their mutual cause. Our time is valuable equally and these capitalisitc coorporative things are welcome here.

Food for thought really it is! Delicious food @adsactly ;)

mahedi080 (49) 7 years ago

Great post, I concur with you on generally focuses. Free enterprise and insatiability go as an inseparable unit, and keeping in mind that the generation of merchandise turns out to be savagely proficient at cutting costs, this additionally implies for ordinary individuals, they turn out to be less pertinent on the off chance that they are excessively costly and afterward supplanted. Like you stated, first companies started to combine offices inside themselves, removing the procuring of outside gatherings to do additional work. At that point some time later, occupations are outsourced to different nations which enables those nations to grow; in any case, home nation subjects lose employments. Also, now with the ascent of robotization, AI and robots, human work turns out to be less significant as benefits take off each higher.

The thought you propose, of confining asset generation to a geographic region, is certainly fascinating. It implies each territory at that point winds up independent, and giving occupants employer stability as each calling needs work. Yet, constraining in view of geology alone rebuffs, I think, the individuals who live in remote territories with bring down populaces, or even basically puts that are more rural in nature.

I'd be more disposed to seek after something that swings the covetousness pendulum back to some degree. It implies higher charges on benefits, most likely, however in a perfect world wouldn't demolish the inspiration to be effective. Steemit itself has the fundamental pay gathering; I think benefit financed essential wage for all individuals may at any rate furnish everybody with a satisfactory least way of life. It isn't so much that we can or ought to totally kill disparity, yet we completely should ensure that imbalance isn't so enormous like it is today.

$1.72

1 vote