You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Non-GumpyCompliant vote sellers are now to be used exclusively to profit from the reward pool!

in #abuse • 7 years ago

I still think it is not random. It is not only about the time, read the first few lines on the comment and you'll understand, I hope.

image

7 years ago in #abuse by
$0.33
  • Past Payouts $0.33
  • - Author $0.32
  • - Curators $0.02
10 votes
Reply 1
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago 

    I've read it. You'll have to spell it out for me. I'm not sure what you're referring to.

    Let's say for the sake of argument it's not random, then it's arbitrary. @grumpycat arbitrarily chooses. Here are my points.

    1. @brandonfrye uses @jerrybanfield which is listed as a compliant voting bot. Not only is it compliant, but also @brandonfrye gets dinged within a day of posting. He did not abuse the voting bot nor did he use an abusive voting bot, so why? You should read @grumpycat's response. https://steemit.com/steemit/@brandonfrye/steemit-upvote-bots-still-profitable-or-waste-of-money
    2. @purepinay used @appreciator which is also one of the compliant voting bots. She also got dinged and took it like a champ anyway. Read @grumpycat's response https://steemit.com/steemit/@purepinay/thinking-about-tomorrow-today-reinvest-and-power-up

    Even better...@grumpycat also uses @appreciator

    So maybe it's not random. If it's not, then it's definitely based on an arbitrary set of rules that can be changed on a whim because they have nothing to do with actually compliant voting bots or 6th day voting. It's more like

    Just because

    $0.00
      Reply

      Coin Marketplace

      STEEM 0.21
      TRX 0.26
      JST 0.040
      BTC 101854.93
      ETH 3674.01
      USDT 1.00
      SBD 3.18