Fair enough.
The woman can choose if she gets an abortion, in spite of what the biological father wants.
Do you support the right for men to refuse to pay alimony for a child they did not want?
Her body, her choice.
His wallet, no choice.
Fair enough.
The woman can choose if she gets an abortion, in spite of what the biological father wants.
Do you support the right for men to refuse to pay alimony for a child they did not want?
Her body, her choice.
His wallet, no choice.
He had his choice, to keep it in the pants.
As did she, no?
And since both decided not to, they should share responsibility. Yet, since it's woman's body, her health risks, and if she decides to bear the child, about two years of her life dedicated pretty much exclusively to the child, she should be the only one to decide whether to abort.
(Though I think some form of man's legally binding declaration of non-support could be there, but before the intercourse, not after.)
I always wondered about this exactly. Your body, your choice, so why not your financial responsibility? That just doesn't seem right.