Burqa Wearing Fighter Pilots Are Ok Surely?
Judge Rinder, a woke arbitrator who oversees civil cases, was left fuming on election night. Burqa Wearing Fighter Pilots Are Ok Surely?
Thinly Veiled Wokeism
The arguments about whether or not Muslim women should wear face veils continue to trigger woke leftists into fits of abhorrent outrage. Boris's father Stanley Johnson proved himself to be as bigoted as his son. Channel 4's virtue signalling guests provided live commentary as the results came in, and as if by magic, the topic of burqas came up.
During the live show, Stanley attempted to defend the position that in certain circumstances Muslim women should take off their full-face veils. Stanley approached it using this hypothetical situation. If a woman fighter jet pilot were to navigate the aircraft, then it would be necessary for her to remove the medieval Islamic garb. Left-wing comedian (if there is such a thing) Nish Kumar, an anti-Brexit bigot, instantly shouted Stanley down "what are you talking about man?" he said.
Dishonourable Judgement
Judge Rinder, spurred on by the moans and the groans of the woke audience, also flew into an apoplectic fit of righteous condemnation. It's about being qualified to fly a fighter jet, being able to see and navigate the plane is an irrelevance of course!Judge Rinder, Nish Kumar and the woke audience may have a problem with Germany who banned Muslim women wearing the face veil while driving a car. According to traffic laws in Germany, motorists are required to have 'unhindered all-round visibility'. Perhaps there is no requirement for 'unhindered all-round visibility' as a fighter jet pilot?
A Muslim woman took exception to this unreasonable requirement of German law. She lost her case, the court ruled the law did not violate her religious freedom. Another Muslim woman was fined in France for driving erratically while wearing the niqab, French Police noticed how carelessly she was driving at the time. Speaking of the incident, commanding officer Charles Bourillon said:
'[The headscarf] was bothering the driver in her manoeuvres ... It was obvious she could not see a thing,'The European Court of Human Rights also upheld a ban imposed by France on the wearing of face-covering veils in public, rejecting arguments that the measure violates religious freedoms.
Now sit back and think for just one moment, is it unreasonable and bigoted to hold the view that in certain circumstances and situations, it is inappropriate to wear a full-face veil?
According to the woke left - well we know the answer to that actually.
Posted from TR.News with SteemPress : https://www.tr.news/burqa-wearing-fighter-pilots-are-ok-surely/
FREEDOM:
wear what you like: punks can wear giant safety pins! Mods can wear, oversized green coats! Lawyer can wear a suit, etc
BUT, can anyone wear a helmet covering the face & become a bank cashier?
it's a mistake to confuse, freedom of choice to wear whatever one likes with specific clothing requirements for a specific purpose! In a way the chap saying "qualified" is correct, the only problem is one needs full vision to become qualified & therefore it's not a "cultural/religious" issue but can you qualify in the first place with partial vision. I would assume a partially sighted individual regardless of colour/creed cannot become a pilot!
the fact that such obvious factor doesn't even enter their minds or deliberately ignored says only one thing:
Dhimmi BRIT-istan
- PiPtar
"How to make an audience hate you"
This so-called comedian on stage seems to take great pride in not telling jokes to rile up the audience before he starts. He keeps boasting about being paid to be there and being asked to finish up before his time is over, and still doesn't tell any jokes like he was paid to do. Was he on drugs? Surprised they didn't turn off his microphone. His voice is incredibly whiny.