Thanks for saying that @kerrywolf.

I often try to keep my opinions to myself on these subjects to protect other people's volatile sensitivities against me, which can have disastrous effects on my valuable social and business relationships. Conflict is something that is disharmonious with my nature, and I dislike the argumentative meltdown tactics people tend to use against me: passive aggressiveness, guilt shaming, emotional outbursts, the works! Are people always taught to react with nonsense manipulation when defending certain subjects? NPC's?

There are so many laws and legal issues people seem to believe that we (the opposition) should no longer have a right to have an any alternate opinion on, regardless of our research, because they think it is inhumane.

How can that be when it was regular uneducated Americans or representatives who voted as a majority to pass those dicey laws in the first place? Shouldn't we have a right to present research to educate others, so they can calmly re-examine whether or not that should change their perspective on whether or not current or future laws are good or bad?

The pharma, vaccine, trans-surgery, and abortion companies have a clear agenda to make more and more money off of taxpayers through laws. I got more of a fiscal problem with that than a moral objection to the actual substances and procedures they are performing.