You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Thoughts for Curation Guilds
Good point. I would support the idea of investor-vests. I think it would potentially solve a large part of the problem. I still really like the idea of guilds though, largely because of the social aspect. I think the idea of people banding together under a shared set of principles to help each other curate could add a lot of value (if it were implemented the right way). IMO, a combination of both curation guilds and investor-vests would be the most ideal.
I support the social aspect of guilds as well, and I agree with the points you made in your post about guilds forming communities, having rankings, ways to communicate, etc. I don't think guilds are a great solution to the problem of investors not wanting to actively curate though, nor do I think it is generally a good idea for stake to be "rented out" (even more than is already happening). Stakeholders banding together to cooperate, exercise quality control over each other, and function as a community I do support.