You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: My PALNET Updates:
Distribution is definitely a factor, as it gives a frame of reference. When you say that 2500 PALcoin stake should reward 2 PAL on a post, you're essentially saying that a 37k SP account on steem should award 30 steem for an upvote. Your logic is faulty because you're basing this off what you've expected on steem, and this token has a much lower supply than steem. The problem is decimal precision, and that's being fixed asap.
Decimal precision and valuation are opposite sides of the same PALcoin.
0.01 PAL with PAL at 1 STEEM is the same thing as 1 PAL at 0.01 STEEM
For the record, what's done is done and at this point decimal precision is the solution. My point is not that it should by 1 PAL, it's that your 'average' user should be able to earn the minimum transferable increment from a 100% upvote. If that's 1 PAL at 0.000001 STEEM each or 0.000001 PAL at 1 STEEM each is completely irrelevant.
Edit: I didn't say that 2500 should reward 2 PAL; obviously that would be a totally broken inflation rate. What I said is that the tokenomics should have been checked to ensure that you didn't have to be an insider to earn curation.