The Big Bang theory? A theory that makes no sense. Can't believe it.

The Big Bang Theory - (by Elizabeth Howell, www.space.com)

"The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the universe as we know it started with a small singularity, then inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today."

This theory makes no sense and there is no evidence of this. Only the ones that we have imagined. Sooo.... we are to believe that there was nothing. Then all of a sudden a big explosion occurred. That explosion caused the universe as we know it. Before the explosion, there was "Absolute nothing"

Why do we think this?

As humans, we need to establish a beginning. We need to know how we got here and our purpose. Humans haven't been around that long, relative to the universe. We reproduce and evolve over many years. We search for our purpose on Earth. The more we learn about space expands our mind. We naturally need to explain this universe that we observe. Basically, we don't know shit out there. We are learning and building with each generation. One day humans will know so much more. One million years, Humans will know so much about the universe. In the present, humans are babies and will grow and evolve. We once thought the sun revolves around the earth. We got smarter and realize that wasn't true.

Flawed Theory

The universe follows laws. I believe things don't exist without an opposite. Atoms at its core, have a positive and a negative. Everything we know of on earth or space follows this law. (Sidebar) Death is needed for life to exist. Without death, we couldn't evolve. Ultimately we wouldn't exist. ) Something existed in absolute nothing exploded and created the universe? This is not possible following the "Universal Law". That explosion could only happen if there was an opposite force. (We know that things exist because of positive and negative forces) This would tell us that there was something before the supposed "Big Bang Theory". I would argue that stars, black holes etc are alive. They are energy masses that ages and dies. Its death is just as important as its birth. We know that on earth living things die. These living things also create new improved life. The new life improves with the information from the dead. (Because of human death we exist today. Maybe that will change your perspective) We have evidence of this by learning about DNA\RNA. These stars die and some go "Supernova". These supernovas explode and give life to new improved stars. These stars have the information from its dying star. Afterall, that new star is created from the same particles of its dying star. That exploding stars death is critical for new ones. I would say these stars are alive and don't want to die. BALANCE is a keyword dealing with our universe. These negative and positive properties that exist in our universe want balance. Atoms exist because of the balance of the protons and neutrons. There are no absolutes so these properties fluctuate. If these negatives or positives start to dominate (These forces don't want to take over each other. Their existence is based on being balanced.) Based on the laws described, the non-dominate will evolve to restore balance.

So looking at how things work. We have to conclude that there was something before the Big Bang. We are limited to our understanding and information. But... we are on our path to get there. We now are an important part of this path. We will learn more and evolve. These improved humans will look back and say that ancestors thought crazy things. They will also know that we are a part of their improved existence.

What do you think? Keep thinking outside the box.

Note: This post is MY own unbiased perspective and how I see the world.

Author: Fdot2000

Like this perspective? Please upvote and comment. Share with others to see what they think.